Home Educational Articles Curriculum Sacred vs. Secular Music In Public School Concerts
Sacred vs. Secular Music In Public School Concerts PDF Print E-mail
Curriculum
Written by Chad Criswell   
Christmas tree with iceIt's that time of year again when thoughts turn to holiday concerts and that one, slight possibility that lingers in the back of a teacher's mind that someone, somewhere in the audience will make a stink because of the inclusion of one or two sacred selections into the program.  The squabble over whether or not to include sacred music in a secular band or choir concert is always inflamed around the Christmas holidays but can occur at any time of the year.   What should a teacher do to program a high quality experience while avoiding any unneeded stress?

 In 2007 Cedar Wood Elementary school was just one of many schools that changed their Christmas musical programs under fear of possible complaint or litigation.  In Cedar Wood's case the change was in response to the district being sued for including the Ave Maria in a graduation ceremony the year before.  This case is by no means unique, and it underscores the importance that teachers must place on basing their music selections on a firm curricular foundation.  These types of challenges have become more and more common in the sixty years since the 1948 Supreme Court ruling that religious instruction in public schools was unconstitutional. 

Is Sacred Music in a Public School Concert Illegal?  


The Music Educator's National Conference (MENC)  has just published a new discussion on the topic of Sacred vs. Secular and a person can tell from the comments that the topic has touched a large percentage of teacher's lives.  They also have a very useful and informative official statement about the use of Sacred Music In The Schools, including citations of court cases such as a 1971 opinion by Chief Justice Warren Berger that set forth these basic questions as a partial litmus test as to whether or not sacred music should be allowed to be used in a particular instance (quoted from the MENC article):

1. What is the purpose of the activity?  Is the purpose secular in nature, that is, studying music of a particular composer's style or historical period?

2. What is the primary effect of the activity? Is it the celebration of religion? Does the activity either enhance or inhibit religion? Does it invite confusion of thought or family objections?

3. Does the activity involve excessive entanglement with a religion or religious group, or between the schools and religious organizations? Financial support can, in certain cases, be considered an entanglement.

 

 

Comments
Add New RSS
R Moest  - nonsense |138.145.242.xxx |2008-11-25 06:14:08
Your choice of wording betrays your bias in favor of the superstitious.

As for the "very useful" Berger points:
>What is the primary effect of the activity?

and
> Does the activity involve excessive entanglement
>


Tell me what unit of measure to employ.
Carl McD  - confusing comment |207.165.188.xxx |2008-11-25 08:37:32
I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to say with your comment. If anything
your own choice of wording also betrays your motives, i.e. religion =
superstition.
R Moest wrote:
Your choice of wording betrays your bias in favor of the superstitious.


In addition, what are you asking here?
Quote:


As for the "very useful" Berger points:
>What is the primary effect of the activity?

and
> Does the activity involve excessive entanglement
>


Tell me what unit of measure to employ.

Essentially Berger's statements say that a school concert can use sacred music
as long as the concert is not sponsoring or advocating the religion. The same
would be said if the group performed Hanukkah songs or the music of some other
organized religion. The fact is that modern western music is based on the
musical traditions of the old church. There is no way to teach music
comprehensively without in some way referencing this fact. To deny that fact
and repress the use of such music purely on the basis of separation of church
and state is to change history.

Learning about something does not constitute induction. By teaching about Nazi
Germany in history class we do not breed a new generation of Hitler Youth.
Likewise by teaching about the impact of the music of the church on society we
do not convert a student into a believer.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
 

Related Articles:

No related articles found
RocketTheme Joomla Templates